Monday, April 9, 2007

Truth-Justice-Federal Compel Order-Health

QUESTIONS TO THE PUBLIC: HAS DAKOTA COUNTY ATTORNEY JAMES BACKSTROM NEGLIENT OF 823 ALLEN
KRENGELS HEALTH & HOUSING RIGHTS IN FEE SIMPLE ABSOLUTE?
Tell your governor: Help stop dangerous "super bug" in hospitals! Petition
If Alice drinks, ill health is Backstrom complicit with Judge Leslie Metzen to Order Alice to a hospital? instead of stealing her Homestead?
CompelOrder-04-07T185_14 Nancy Osterman BettySpeaker_2
www.sharon4council.blogspot.com Sample Dakota County Venue of Winning BloggerMND
em_ex


  • COURT DOCUMENTS

    • Summons
    Certificate of Representation
    Defendants Joint Answer
    SLAPP Motion
    Plaintiffs' Memorandum of Law in Opposition to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss
    Motion to Dismiss Denied


    Saturday, April 7, 2007

    Happy Easter from DDA



    Happy Easter!

    --
    Diabetics/Disabled Anonymous, Non Profit Support Group and Alliance.

    1144 Ottawa Avenue
    West St. Paul, MN USA 55118-2008
    Fax and Phone: 651 457 4376

    DDAweb@comcast.net
    ddaweb.org Newly discovered Evidence CompelOrder-04-07T185_14
    DDAvolunteers@comcast.net

    Wednesday, March 28, 2007

    Humor-Healing-Health-Braga-Vodka Bread of Life

    The history of Russian vodka at Russian Foods .com
    --
    DDA
    1144 Ottawa Avenue
    West St. Paul, MN USA 55118-2008
    Fax and Phone: 651 457 4376


    NOTICE: This communication is not encrypted. This e-mail (including any attachments) is covered by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. §§ 2510-2521, and is confidential. If you are not the intended recipient or believe that you have received this communication in error, please report that fact to the sender and delete the copy that you received. In addition, you should not print, copy, retransmit, disseminate, or otherwise use the information. No permission is given to edit or otherwise alter the information contained in this message. No information or opinions contained herein shall constitute legal advice. THANK YOU.






    Update on Alice: Saw her at Passport Yesterday Tues 27Mar07 at 3:45pm.
    Touched By Angels
    We walked to bus:
    1. Metzen denied Restitution of Homestead at 823 Allen West St. Paul, Mayor John Zanmiller, apparantly based on the bizzare fact that Alice did not go voluntarily to Treatment for Alcoholism?

    2. Kory Land is no longer the prosecutor in this case: its the head lawyer from the League of Cities?

    3. Julia.althouse@smrls.org non-profit has an immediate appeal "

    Alice is in good spirits has a woman friend at Mary Hall, is moving on in Life>

    We know what goes on in these Commitments ie: www.lufsky.blogspot.com which Metzen is culpbable for.

    Murder of Tanya Cusantio curt.brown@startribune.com
    http://www.sharon4council.blogspot.com/ http://www.sharon-mn-ecf.blogspot.com/
































    Wednesday, March 21, 2007

    HF1841AliceLandlord

    GOOD LUCK ON APPEAL


    HF 1841LandordTenant Alice we've been there done that: Get with the program to help others from your heinous experience:
    I miss my animals tooooooo However instead of puzzles lobby the legislature for your State & Federal Constitutional Rights of Homeownership: Further be aware if your "taking" money for assistance from a different county than "dakota" your Homestead is gone via Abandonment. County of Financial Responsibility. We're getting close to property tax time? Who's paying your property tax's????www.salvationarmy.org WWW.LUFSKY.BLOGSPOT.COM HIS COUNTY IS ANOKA, IE: Carlton

    Wednesday, March 14, 2007

    Alice Krengel Update 14Mar07

    Click here: Alice Krengel,it was a pleasure to see you 13Mar07 Tues at Passport.

    You stated you have an Appeal Pending: Good Luck
    The conflict of Judge Metzen and Kory Land Prosecutor is likened to a Banana Republic ie; http://www.democracynow.org

    your friends/advocates Bill and Sharon check our blogs in sig. below
    www.sharon-mn-ecf.blogspot.com www.billdahn.blogspot.com


    family /s/ Bill Dahn tel: 651-453-1992 PO Box 7417 ECF#P1291866 Ojb-Sioux#408B19111www.

    LEGAL NOTICE: /s/Sharon4Anderson@aol.com ECF_P165913Pacersa1299 telfx: 651-776-5835: Document's are based on SEC filings, current events, interviews, press releases, and knowledge gained as financial journalists, Private Attorney Generals, Candidates for Public Offices, and may contain errors. Investment decisions should not be based solely on these documentexpressly forbids its writers from having financial interests in securities they recommend to readers, affiliated entities, employees, and agents an initial trade recommendation published on the Internet, after a direct mail

    Monday, March 5, 2007

    Nuisance codifiedMS561.01(1998)-2007

    Legal Notice to James Backstrom Dakota AttorneyJames C. Backstrom, Dakota County Attorney, Respondent, vs. One 1989 Range Rov
    Don Gudmonson Dakota Sheriff
    Chicago Greylord Operations - Google Search
    Bud Shaver WestSt.Paul Police

    COUNT I Title 18

    Alice is still at DorothyDay, On or about Tues.27Feb07 Alice apparantly appeared in Judge Leslie Metzens Court Room, by information and belief: represented by SMRLS Julia Althouse

    AFFIDAVITS OF SHARON ANDERSON AND BILL DAHN
    Candidates St. Paul City Council www.sharon4council.blogspot.com
    www.billdahn.blogspot.com 42 USC 3631

    COUNT IIMS 609.51SimulatingLegProcess
    challenging the St. Paul City Ordinance and Merger of LIEP-DPSINuisance laws_17 are making serious charges against Judge Leslie Metzen, www.levander.com Kory Land aka Larson re:
    EMINENT DOMAIN: Alice Krengel, 823 Allen, WSP

    Both verily believe Alice is charged with repealed Statutes as We directly believe that Alice has never intentionally interfered with the use and enjoyment of the plaintiffs land" or her Neighbors Propertys, surrounded by Martys Bar, Gallaghers and 40 Acres Liquor Store. FishLakeNuisance

    Further we allege that the Mayor of West St. Paul John Zanmiller also ViceChair WaterA06-1150f/_26of St. Paul Water Board also apparant corrections officeralso defendant ? has with malice intent approved the WST.PaulLic
    kicking out Alice's Disabled Tenants to create bizzare examples.


  • RENTAL DWELLING ORDINANCE
  • RENTAL DWELLING ORDINANCE APPROVED BY CITY COUNCIL
  • INFORMATION FOR RENTAL HOUSING EVALUATORS
  • RENTAL DWELLING ORDINANCE

    Click here to view the Rental Dwelling Ordinance

    Attached Document or FileRental Dwelling Ordinance

    RENTAL DWELLING ORDINANCE APPROVED BY CITY COUNCIL

    On November 27, 2006, the City Council approved an Ordinance regulating rental housing in the City. A Public Hearing was held at the meeting for the Rental Dwelling Ordinance. The first reading of the Ordinance was held and approved on November 13, 2006. Click here to view the Rental Dwelling Ordinance.





    Finding of Nuisance: codified MS561.01(199561. Nuisance, Trespass, Waste; Damages8)

    Minnesota Statutes 2006
    Chapter 561. Nuisance, Trespass, Waste; Damages

    Copyright © 2006 by the Office of Revisor of Statutes, State of Minnesota.

    561.01
    Nuisance; action.
    561.02
    Maliciously maintained structure.
    561.03
    Remedies.
    561.04
    Trespass; treble damages.
    561.05
    Repealed.
    561.051
    Liability for acts of wild animals.
    561.06
    Repealed.
    561.07
    Animals may be impounded.
    561.08
    Owner of property may distrain.
    561.09
    Owner of animals liable for trespass.
    561.10
    Trespass after execution or foreclosure sale.
    561.11
    Repealed.
    561.12
    Repealed.
    561.13
    Repealed.
    561.14
    Repealed.
    561.15
    Repealed.
    561.16
    Repealed.
    561.17
    Action for waste.
    561.18
    Waste pending year for redemption; injunction.
    561.19
    Nuisance liability of agricultural operations.

    561.01 NUISANCE; ACTION.
    Anything which is injurious to health, or indecent or offensive to the senses, or an obstruction
    to the free use of property, so as to interfere with the comfortable enjoyment of life or property, is
    a nuisance. An action may be brought by any person whose property is injuriously affected or
    whose personal enjoyment is lessened by the nuisance, and by the judgment the nuisance may be
    enjoined or abated, as well as damages recovered.
    History:
    (9580) RL s 4446

    561.02 MALICIOUSLY MAINTAINED STRUCTURE.
    Any fence, or any other structure, maliciously erected or maintained for the purpose of
    annoying the owners or occupants of adjoining property shall be deemed a private nuisance.
    History:
    (9581) 1907 c 387 s 1

    561.03 REMEDIES.
    Any such owner or occupant injured, either in comfort or in the enjoyment of an estate by
    such fence, or any other structure, may have an action of tort for the damage sustained thereby
    and may have such nuisance abated.
    History:
    (9582) 1907 c 387 s 2; 1986 c 444

    561.04 TRESPASS; TREBLE DAMAGES.
    Whoever without lawful authority cuts down or carries off any wood, underwood, tree, or
    timber, or girdles or otherwise injures any tree, timber, or shrub, on the land of another person, or
    in the street or highway in front of any person's house, city lot, or cultivated grounds, or on the
    commons or public grounds of any city or town, or in the street or highway in front thereof, is
    liable in a civil action to the owner of such land, or to such city or town, for treble the amount
    of damages which may be assessed therefor, unless upon the trial it appears that the trespass
    was casual or involuntary, or that the defendant had probable cause to believe that the land on
    which the trespass was committed was the defendant's, or that of the person in whose service
    or by whose direction the act was done, in which case judgment shall be given for only the
    single damages assessed. This section shall not authorize the recovery of more than the just
    value of timber taken from uncultivated woodland for the repair of a public highway or bridge
    upon or adjoining the land.
    History:
    (9585) RL s 4449; 1973 c 123 art 5 s 7; 1986 c 444

    561.05 [Repealed, 1963 c 753 art 2 s 17]

    561.051 LIABILITY FOR ACTS OF WILD ANIMALS.
    An owner of land shall not be liable in trespass, nuisance, or otherwise for the actions of
    wild animals in their natural state.
    History:
    1982 c 462 s 10

    561.06 [Repealed, 1963 c 753 art 2 s 17]

    561.07 ANIMALS MAY BE IMPOUNDED.
    Any person may, and every sheriff and police officer shall, distrain and impound any cattle,
    horses, mules, sheep, swine, or any domestic fowls running at large or trespassing upon the lands
    of another or upon any public property in this state, and when so impounded such proceedings
    shall be had relative to the animals and fowls so impounded as are or shall be provided by the
    general laws of this state relating to the impounding of animals.
    History:
    (1388) 1921 c 319 s 3; 1967 c 516 s 1; 2005 c 10 art 2 s 4

    561.08 OWNER OF PROPERTY MAY DISTRAIN.
    The owner or occupant of lands in any city may distrain any of such animals or fowls
    doing damage on such lands, and thereupon such proceedings as to these animals or fowls and
    the disposition thereof and the damage done thereby as are or shall be provided by the general
    laws of this state relating to the distraining by the owner or occupant of lands, of any beast
    doing damage thereon, the disposition of the beast distrained, and the appraisal of the damages,
    and the collection thereof.
    History:
    (1389) 1921 c 319 s 4; 1973 c 123 art 5 s 7

    561.09 OWNER OF ANIMALS LIABLE FOR TRESPASS.
    In case the owner or occupant of lands shall not distrain the animals or fowls doing damage
    as provided herein, then any person who shall knowingly permit the running at large or trespass
    of any such domestic animal or fowl within any city, shall be liable to the person aggrieved for
    treble the damages sustained, to be recovered in a civil action.
    History:
    (1390) 1921 c 319 s 5; 1973 c 123 art 5 s 7; 1986 c 444

    561.10 TRESPASS AFTER EXECUTION OR FORECLOSURE SALE.
    When real property is sold on execution or under judgment or mortgage, the purchaser
    thereof, or any person who has succeeded to the purchaser's interest, after the estate becomes
    absolute, may recover damages for injury to the property by the tenant in possession after the
    sale, and before possession is delivered under the conveyance.
    History:
    (9586) RL s 4450; 1986 c 444

    561.11 [Repealed, 1986 c 398 art 12 s 5]

    561.12 [Repealed, 1986 c 398 art 12 s 5]

    561.13 [Repealed, 1986 c 398 art 12 s 5]

    561.14 [Repealed, 1986 c 398 art 12 s 5]

    561.15 [Repealed, 1986 c 398 art 12 s 5]

    561.16 [Repealed, 1986 c 398 art 12 s 5]

    561.17 ACTION FOR WASTE.
    If a guardian, tenant for life or years, joint tenant, or tenant in common, of real property,
    commits waste thereon, any person injured by the waste may bring an action against the waster
    therefor, in which there may be judgment for treble damages, forfeiture of the estate of the party
    offending, and eviction from the property. Judgment of forfeiture and eviction can only be given
    in favor of the person entitled to the reversion, against the tenant in possession when the injury to
    the estate in reversion is adjudged in the action to be equal to the value of the tenant's estate or
    unexpired term, or to have been done in malice.
    History:
    (9583) RL s 4447; 1986 c 444

    561.18 WASTE PENDING YEAR FOR REDEMPTION; INJUNCTION.
    When real property is sold upon execution or under judgment or mortgage, until the
    expiration of the time allowed for redemption, the court may restrain the commission of waste
    on the property, by order granted, with or without notice, on application of the purchaser or the
    purchaser's assigns holding the certificate of sale; but it is not waste for the person in possession of
    the property at the time of sale, or entitled to the possession afterwards, during the time allowed
    for redemption, to continue to use it in the same manner in which it was previously used, or to use
    it in the ordinary course of husbandry, or to make the necessary repairs of the buildings thereon,
    or to use wood or timber on the property therefor, or for the repair of fences or for fuel for the
    possessor's family, while the possessor occupies the property.
    History:
    (9584) RL s 4448; 1986 c 444

    561.19 NUISANCE LIABILITY OF AGRICULTURAL OPERATIONS.
    Subdivision 1. Definitions. For the purposes of this section, the following terms have the
    meanings given them:
    (a) "Agricultural operation" means a facility and its appurtenances for the production of
    crops, livestock, poultry, dairy products or poultry products, but not a facility primarily engaged
    in processing agricultural products.
    (b) "Established date of operation" means the date on which the agricultural operation
    commenced. If the agricultural operation is subsequently expanded or significantly altered,
    the established date of operation for each expansion or alteration is deemed to be the date of
    commencement of the expanded or altered operation. As used in this paragraph, "expanded"
    means an expansion by at least 25 percent in the number of a particular kind of animal or livestock
    located on an agricultural operation.
    "Significantly altered" does not mean:
    (1) a transfer of an ownership interest to and held by persons or the spouses of persons
    related to each other within the third degree of kindred according to the rules of civil law to the
    person making the transfer so long as at least one of the related persons is actively operating the
    farm, or to a family farm trust under section
    500.24;
    (2) temporary cessation or interruption of cropping activities;
    (3) adoption of new technologies; or
    (4) a change in the crop product produced.
    (c) "Generally accepted agricultural practices" means those practices commonly used by
    other farmers in the county or a contiguous county in which a nuisance claim is asserted.
    Subd. 2. Agricultural operation not a nuisance. (a) An agricultural operation is not and
    shall not become a private or public nuisance after two years from its established date of operation
    as a matter of law if the operation:
    (1) is located in an agriculturally zoned area;
    (2) complies with the provisions of all applicable federal, state, or county laws, regulations,
    rules, and ordinances and any permits issued for the agricultural operation; and
    (3) operates according to generally accepted agricultural practices.
    (b) For a period of two years from its established date of operation, there is a rebuttable
    presumption that an agricultural operation in compliance with the requirements of paragraph (a),
    clauses (1) to (3), is not a public or private nuisance.
    (c) The provisions of this subdivision do not apply:
    (1) to an animal feedlot facility with a swine capacity of 1,000 or more animal units as
    defined in the rules of the Pollution Control Agency for control of pollution from animal feedlots,
    or a cattle capacity of 2,500 animals or more;
    (2) to any prosecution for the crime of public nuisance as provided in section
    609.74 or to an
    action by a public authority to abate a particular condition which is a public nuisance; or
    (3) to any enforcement action brought by a local unit of government related to zoning under
    chapter 394 or 462.
    Subd. 3. Existing contracts. This section shall not be construed to invalidate any contracts
    or commitments made before January 1, 1983.
    Subd. 4. Severability. If a provision of this section, or application thereof to any person or
    set of circumstances, is held invalid or unconstitutional, the invalidity shall not affect other
    provisions or applications of this section which can be given effect without the invalid provision
    or application. To that end, the provisions of this section are declared to be severable.
    Subd. 5.[Repealed, 1983 c 182 s 2]
    History:
    1982 c 533 s 1; 1983 c 182 s 1; 1994 c 619 s 9,10; 1994 c 622 s 4,5; 2001 c
    128 s 4; 2004 c 254 s 43,44

    Friday, February 23, 2007

    Nuisance Law MS.617UnconstitutionallyVague


    TO FRED GRITTNER: CLERK www.mncourts.gov
    ATTENTION LORY SWANSON www.ag.state.mn.us
    Dated: Fri.23FEb07 4:15pm

    Click here: State of Minnesota, Appellant vs. Daniel Alan Kuhlman, Respondent, A06-568, Court of Appeals Published, September

    S Y L L A B U S

    The Minnesota legislature has expressly preempted local ordinances that are “in conflict” with the Minnesota Highway Traffic Regulation Act. The Minneapolis photo-enforcement ordinance is “in conflict” with the Act for two reasons. First, it violates the Act’s uniformity requirement. Second, it reduces the state’s burden of proof in a prosecution for a traffic-signal violation." Hatch-State,Heffern_Appell,Bass-Resp,Sessoms-Amicus

    By information and belief talking to www.alicekrengel.blogspot.com Thurs.22Feb07, Alice stated her smrls lawyer julia.althouse@smrls.com had an appeal to be heard 27thFeb07. Alice has a severe cold, the cruel and unusual punishment of the "taking" of her homestead is UnConstitutionally Bizzare.

    Nuisance laws_17 The undersigned has only the best interest of Alice at heart, must implore the State Attorney General to come in on the Constitutionality of MS617, the above pending Photo Cop Case is applicable:

    AMICUS CURIAE: SHARON ANDERSON AND BILL DAHN: In good Faith, "but for" the horror of prejudice of Judge Leslie Metzen ie: Robert Schumaker elderly Vet, jailed: www.lufsky.blogspot.com inprisoned at St. Peter for years: Alice thrown out on the streets must hold this Judge Criminally liableSCAP

    .AFFIDAVIT SHARON ANDERSON CONCERNED CITIZEN AMICUS CURIE CONSTITUTIONALITY of NUISANCE LAWS "in conflict"

    In the matter of Alice Krengel v. City of West St. Paul

    1. Has the District Court Records (Metzen) wilfully failed Title18s to protect the Laws and Constitution of the State and Federal?42 USC 3631

    2. Has the Private LawFirm Levander,under contract as West St. Paul City Attorney wilfully, with malice used undue influence against Alice and the Nuisance Law to illegally MS 609.51SimulatingLegProcess reducing Alice to Poverty,Peonage in a "Patterned" Enterprise of http://www.levander.com/ 609.903 RICO 609.385Treason denying HomeStead Owner Laws.

    3. M S 8.31 AG Duties must Lory Swanson MN State Attorney General protect and defend the Statutes, when used illegally by Lawyers and Judges to commit THEFT BY SWINDLE, ruin the Health,Safety,Welfare of any citizen.

    4. The Kelo case is not applicable at this time, but if it were is not Alice entitled to Just Compensation triple the amount of the value of property of $189 thous, plus Punatitive, Compensatory, tort damages over $100,000.00 for each and every occurrence for the past (6) years? Kelo_58pdf

    EMINENT DOMAIN IN MINNESOTA: Case study Alice Krengel, 823 Allen, WSP title
    — C H A P T E R 9 —
    Property Rights
    No person shall . . . be deprived of life, liberty, or property,
    without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.

    — Fifth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution

    Rights of the People: Individual Freedom and the Bill of Rights

    FURTHER AFFIANTS SAYETH NOT AT THIS TIME EXCEPT HAVE STANDING IN GOOD FAITH TO PROTECT THE LAWS AND CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS AND PRIVILEGES OF ALL CITIZENS

    Sharon-Minnesota LEGAL NOTICE: /s/Sharon4Anderson@aol.com ECF_P165913Pacersa1299 telfx: 651-776-5835: Document's are based on SEC filings, current events, interviews, press releases, and knowledge gained as financial journalists, Private Attorney Generals, Candidates for Public Offices, and may contain errors. Investment decisions should not be based solely on these documentexpressly forbids its writers from having financial interests in securities they recommend to readers, affiliated entities, employees, and agents an initial trade recommendation published on the Internet, after a direct mail publication is sent, before acting on that recommendation. s BlogItBabe Legal Eagle SharonAnderson Sharon-Sharon-E-Dem CobraShar:aka Sharon4Anderson@aol.com
    SharonsBriefs MinnesotaMortgageMassacre
    http://www.sharon-anderson.blogspot.com/
    Candidate profile Sharon4Anderson's Legal BlogBriefs
    AndersoSharonScarrellaAndersonnI AnderDivas1: Divas Realestate 14 E. Jessamine 14Feb07Demolition RICO-WHISTLEBLOWERS Divas1sonAdvocates Sharon4Anderson Bill Dahn Sexy Seniors1 Alice Krengel Cheryl Hilyar Judicial Delusions1 WILLY LUFSKY Scap129FAnokaP2697(1976) Cpl James R. Anderson USMC 11022885 Bio for Sharon Anderson , Senior Queen 2007 Winter-Carnival TAKING DL_AOL Journal Legal Eagle SharonAnderson 1 Journalism Ethics Blogger: 1986 Petition Jane Duchene MN Bull SharonScarrellaAndersonUSBriefs - Buzznet Photo Sharing Community Sharon'sFedCases1973to2006_13pdf Anderson + Advocates www.sharonanderson.org www.sharon4anderson.org







    AOL now offers free email to everyone. Find out more about what's free from AOL at
    AOL.com.
    Subject:Statev.Kuhlman,Krengel v.City WestStPaul Rule24.04AGConstitutionalityMS617Amicus
    Date:2/23/2007 4:32:33 P.M. Central Standard Time
    From:Sharon4Anderson

    Thursday, February 8, 2007

    Order16Jan07(Toussaint)Whistleblowers CriminalComplaints

    BLEEDING HEART LIBERAL WHERE IS YOUR COMPASSION: What Heinous Crime did Alice committ warrant "taking" her homestead and rentals for 1 year. State of Minnesota by its Attorney General, Mike Hatch, Respondent, vs. Allina Why doesn't the Government protect ALL Citizens.Ex-agent wins lawsuit against FBI

    click on pics to read
    -----------------
    Forwarded Message:
    Subj:AliceA06-2351_16Jan07Toussant.pdf Constitutionality of MS617.xx Nuisance Ord.
    Date:2/8/2007 5:29:39 P.M. Central Standard Time
    From:Sharon4Anderson
    To:Susan.Larson@courts.state.mn.us, cynthia.lehr@courts.state.mn.us, fred.grittner@courts.state.mn.us, edward.toussaint@courts.state.mn.us, russell.anderson@courts.state.mn.us, rca@co.ramsey.mn.us, askdoj@usdoj.gov, james.lackner@usdoj.gov, bbonner@pioneerpress.com, leslie.metzen@courts.state.mn.us, julia.althoff@smrls.org, kland@levander.com, revisor@revisor.leg.state.mn.us, kaplan@lawandpolitics.com, john.harrington@ci.stpaul.mn.us, bob.fletcher@co.ramsey.mn.us
    CC:tim.pawlenty@state.mn.us, attorney.general@state.mn.us, judicial.standards@state.mn.us, minneapolis@fbi.gov, minneapolis@ic.fbi.gov, larry@midmnlegal.org, bruce.beneke@smrls.org
    Right-click picture(s) to display picture options
    TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN:
    Please take legal notice of the Status of www.alicekrengel.blogspot.com , the Heinous, Repugnant Criminal Abuse of Power 42 USC 3631 reducing Alice and others US CODE: Title 18,1581. Peonage; obstructing enforcement
    We the undersigned Whistleblowers have standing as Injured Partys also
    Wilful neglience to enforce the alleged Health Problems of Krengel, cruel and unusual punishment of "taking" Homestead, forcing Alice to sleep at Dorothy Day without Trial by Jury, Consitutionality of MS617.xx, formal complaints decending to particulars.
    Wilful neglience of the State Attorney General to defend the Constitutionality of Statutes and or intervene in this Bizzare "takings" , uniformity of Judicial Travestys costing the taxpayers a fortune www.lufsky.blogspot.com
    Further Affiants sayeth not at this time: www.billdahn.com
    LEGAL NOTICE: document's are based on SEC filings, current events, interviews, press releases, and knowledge gained as financial journalists, Private Attorney Generals, Candidates for Public Offices, and may contain errors. Investment decisions should not be based solely on these documents Cpl James R. Anderson USMC 11022885 Bio for Sharon Anderson , expressly forbids its writers from having financial interests in securities they recommend to readers, affiliated entities, employees, and agents an initial trade recommendation published on the Internet, after a direct mail publication is sent, before acting on that recommendation. TAKING DL_AOL Journal Candidate profile www.blogitbabe.blogspot.com
    Senior QueenCandidate2007 Legal Eagle SharonAnderson 1 Journalism Ethics Blogger: www.judicialdelusions.blogspot.com
    1986 Petition Jane Duchene MN Bull SharonScarrellaAndersonUSBriefs - Buzznet Photo Sharing Community Sharon'sFedCases1973to2006_13pdf Anderson + Advocates www.sharonanderson.org www.sharon4anderson.org www.alicekrengel.blogspot.com www.sharonscarrellaanderson.blogspot.com




    Wednesday, February 7, 2007

    A06-2351Writ Prohibition Dismissed MS617.87

    Subj:Check out MINNESOTA re: Alice Krengel A06-2351Dismissed 16Jan07 (Toussant)
    Date:2/7/2007 3:01:24 P.M. Central Standard Time
    From:Sharon4Anderson
    To:AliceKrengel@yahoo.com, Sharon4Anderson
    Right-click picture(s) to display picture options
    Subject:Fwd: Check out MINNESOTA re: Alice Krengel A06-2351Dismissed 16Jan07 (Toussant)
    Date:2/7/2007 3:05:01 P.M. Central Standard Time
    From:Sharon4Anderson

    Pleas to the Public


    Advocates Alice www.sharon-anderson.blogspot.com www.billdahn.blogspot.com Consitutionality of 617. Abortion; Obscenity; Houses Of Ill-fame Is MS617.87 used to Steal Realestate from the Poor?
    617.86 CONTEMPT.
    Whoever violates a temporary injunction, permanent injunction, or abatement order granted
    under sections
    617.80 to 617.87 may be adjudged in contempt of court.
    History:
    1987 c 283 s 7

    617.87 RELEASE OF PROPERTY.
    If, after an order of abatement has been entered, the owner appears and pays the costs of
    the action and files a bond in an amount determined by the court, but not to exceed $50,000,
    conditioned that the owner will immediately abate the nuisance for a period of one year, the court
    may, if satisfied of the owner's good faith, order the release of the building or portion of it which is
    subject to the order of abatement. If the premises are released, for each day during the term of the
    bond that the owner knowingly permits any part of the premises to be used for any activity which
    was the basis of the abatement order, the owner shall forfeit $1,000 under the bond. Forfeiture
    under the bond does not relieve the owner from prosecution for contempt. Release of the property
    pursuant to this section does not release it from an injunction issued under section
    617.83 or any
    other judgment, penalty, lien, or liability to which it may be subject by law.
    History:
    1987 c 283 s 8



    Click here: MINNESOTA 7Feb07 Update: Pursuant to the undersign's call to http://www.mncourts.gov/ re:
    THANKS FOR COOPERATION

    Alice Krengel Petitioner A06-2351 v. City of West St. Paul

    651-296-2581 Summary as stated , clerk was very courteous Milessa Thanks.

    "ORDER" denying Writ of Prohibition /s/ Toussaint dtd.16Jan07
    Schumaker-Dietzen basically stating:

    Nuisance Ordinance Aug06 Permanent 20Nov06(Metzen)
    1 year Denying Homestead Property Right based on
    Inadequate , Premature Writ, Remedys may be obtained
    in District Court.
    3 cases ? Hancock v Nelson Bellows and xx v. Issacs

    Law Library 651-296-2775 sheri.huppert@courts.state.mn.us
    When Briefs are subjected for public scrunity and online.
    Dennis.skrade@courts.state.mn.us Sharon does not require the
    hardbound Statutes now online. If Annotated are available please call
    651-776-5835

    LEGAL NOTICE: document's are based on SEC filings, current events, interviews, press releases, and knowledge gained as financial journalists, Private Attorney Generals, Candidates for Public Offices, and may contain errors. Investment decisions should not be based solely on these documents Cpl James R. Anderson USMC 11022885 Bio for Sharon Anderson , expressly forbids its writers from having financial interests in securities they recommend to readers, affiliated entities, employees, and agents an initial trade recommendation published on the Internet, after a direct mail publication is sent, before acting on that recommendation. TAKING DL_AOL Journal Candidate profile www.blogitbabe.blogspot.com
    Senior QueenCandidate2007 Legal Eagle SharonAnderson 1 Journalism Ethics Blogger: www.judicialdelusions.blogspot.com
    1986 Petition Jane Duchene MN Bull SharonScarrellaAndersonUSBriefs - Buzznet Photo Sharing Community Sharon'sFedCases1973to2006_13pdf Anderson + Advocates www.sharonanderson.org www.sharon4anderson.org www.alicekrengel.blogspot.com www.sharonscarrellaanderson.blogspot.com
    Public Constitutionality