Alice's Advocates, DDA, Bill & Sharon

Alice's Advocates, DDA, Bill & Sharon
Loading...

Crimes Against Humanity

Monday, January 22, 2007

Alice'sLawyersSMRLS Fed Court Depositions

QUESTIONS FOR PUBLIC POLICY, TRUSTED PROFESSIONALS
"HOMELESS HABITAT" ie:Bob Davis www.am1500.com

Please mosey over to Mpls Federal Court Blg. to research
the RICO Case listed below:

The common Thread of Prosecutors ie: City Attorneys
in concort,complicity with Southern Reg. Leg. Services has not been
abated by the Judicial Branch.

Why is the St. Paul City Council obstructing legal process
by refusing to be deposed:? What are they hiding

"Secret Renovation Contracts" without Bids??



Check www.ademocracy.blogspot.com read comments Julia of SMRLS are representing some Tenants in Stenhauser Fed. Case 321 Bates 1 block from www.sharonanderson.org

Sunday, January 21, 2007

More Dirty Deeds By The City

Please look in the comments for the post. This post is dedicated to the other bob "the landlord hater..
Bob said...

Kathy Lantry
St. Paul City Council
City Hall - Room 320C
15 W. Kellogg Boulevard
St. Paul, MN 55102
LAW OFFICES OF
MINNESOTRAE GIONAL EGAL
SUITE 200
Ifdi EA..T FOIIRTH STREET
ST PA'Alll.. MINNESOTA ri,lOl
(651) 222-5863
FAX (651) 297-6457
August 11,2004
HAND DELIVERED
LAW WORK MANAGER
STEVENWOLFE
ATTORNEYS
JULIAALTHOFF
BETIYBERGER
PERRYDE STEFAN0
M*R111** EAVES
KATHLEENM. EVESTAGE
JON OEFfEN
KEN GlLCHRi8T
JAP*UL HARRIS
LAUWJELINEK
GEWLDG. ULUZNY
DOLLENE LAMBERM
JAMES LAURENCE
LAURA MELNICK
RON MICWLSON
JENNIFER MUCHEK
REBECCAAOSSOW
RACHEL SIBLEY
VALERIE BSNWER
.JAMES J. STREET
COLLEENWALBW
BENJAMIN LWEISS
Re: 321 Bates Avenue
Dear Ms. Lantry:
Southern Minnesota Regional Legal Services represents the tenant-caretaker, Robert King, in the
above-referenced matter. We DO NOT represent the owner of the property. At the legislative
hearing on August 10. 2004, the hearing officer instructed us to write you a written response and
request as you have this matter on the closed agenda. We would respectfully request that you
read this letter along with the August 5, 2004 letter, which is enclosed herein, into the record. We
have also included a copy of the July 22, 2004 inspection notice, the July 27, 2004 letter from the
owner, the July 29, 2004 letter to the legislative hearing officer from our office and a print out from
the Fire Marshall's office verifying that the inspection notice generated July 14, and typed up July
22, 2004, did not get sent thereby proving that the caretaker did not have notice of the repairs
until the actual hearing on July 27, 2004.
Our office has the following concerns in addition to those noted in the attached August 5, 2004
letter:
1. The neighbors have made repeated false allegations that the caretaker,
Mr. King, is involved in drug activity. As you know, our office has a policy that we do not represent
people if there is credible evidence of drug activity. We checked with Ruth Ann Eide from the St.
Paul Force Unit. There is simply no credible evidence that Mr. King is involved in drug activity on
the premises. Quite the contrary, he has met personally with the Force Unit and Ruth Ann Eide
so that he can learn about tenant screening procedures that the Force Unit of St. Paul
recommends. He has agreed to implement their recommendations. Further, he has agreed to
work hand-in-hand with the Force Unit, the District 4 Community Council and the neighbors to
remedy the criminal activity in the neighborhood.
Mr. King has even agreed to put exterior lighting and cameras on the premises to ward off
the criminal element that is out in the neighborhood. He has no more control over the criminal
activity on the street than the complaining neighborhood residents. I challenge you to find a more
responsive caretaker in the Dayton's Bluff Area. At the hearing, the neighbors even accused Mr.
King of having long grass, not that this is a big matter. However, the point is that this was a
EXHIBIT G STP 018291
Case 0:05-cv-01348-JNE-SRN Document 36 Filed 01/16/2007 Page 29 of 46

completely false allegation as I was personally on the premises on Monday and there is no long
grass on the premises. You know as an officer of the court, I am obligated to be honest and you
know me well enough to know that I am honest and straight forward. Since the neighbors are
lying about that and I question whether they are credible about their other allegations. Although
there are a number of police calls, Mr. King had vacated other problem tenants. He is the only
one there and he is willing and able to work with the Force Unit to prevent other bad tenants from
moving in.
2. The lnspection Office has set this case up for failure. The record is clear
that Unit 1 was condemned for being over-crowded. The unit has been vacated. Therefore, that
unit should no longer be condemned. Secondly, the inspection notices have not been sent out as
represented in their letters. We proved this at the hearing. One may construe this as either a
misrepresentation or fraud perpetrated by the inspectors office. Based on how this case has
proceeded one could argue this was just another tool which was being used to vacate the
building. We obtained an inspection report dated July 14, 2004. At the hearing, it was brought up
by the building inspector herself, Pat Fish, that this letter never went out either. Thus, there are
two inspection reports during the time this matter was before the legislative hearing officer. The
two letters listed the repairs that were of issue before the legislative hearing officer and neither the
owner nor the received the repair notices until the actual hearing date. Is that fair play?
Additionally, the apartment was supposed to be reinspected by the City Fire Marshall prior
to the hearing on August 10, 2004. Naturally, that never happened as there was allegedly another
mistake by the City lnspection Department. Although we provided proof by pictures that a
majority of the repairs were made, the City conveniently did not reinspect the premises by the
hearing as promised and thus it caused yet another delay. Moreover, if you look at the July 22,
2004 notice, it is defective on its face as it states the reinspection will be on or after July 12, 2004.
That is clearly erroneous as the reinspection date precedes the date of the notice. Again this
notice was not received until the actual legislative hearing on July 27, 2004. Nevertheless,
essentially all the repairs have been completed with the exception of the electrical work as the
caretaker was taking bids from electricians. If the City Inspector had not been negligent in failing
to give proper notice or if they were not trying to sabotage the success of the repairs, the repairs
would have already been made. I was informed by the on-site and off-site caretakers that they
have narrowed down their electrician bids to two prospects. They will be making a final decision
this Friday on which one to choose.
3. I was concerned that the City was using the Building Inspection Department to
vacate a building of disabling and minority people. Every person in this building was a person in a
protected class. They were either minorities or disabled people. Vacating the building by using
the inspection department in this manner did have a disparate impact. I know the City did not
intend to have a disparate impact. We try to collaborate with the City and try to produce win-win
situations. I can easily see that the owner and tenants would have a claim for disparate impact
against the City. Naturally, I do not represent the owner nor would I be bringing such an action
against the city as we have a long history of collaborating together. However, I thought you
should know that as a practicing housing law attorney who knows about discrimination law that
there is exposure to a discrimination claim on this matter due to the way it was handled.
4. I know you would agree it is best to play with an "open hand" when dealing with
the public. The hearing officer ~nformedu s that the decision will be before the City Council but it
will be presented at a closed meeting. She specifically said we were not invited. I can see the
City Council deliberating in closed chambers on matters. However, when there is a actual vote
whether it is on the consent calendar or otherwise, it should be open to the public for comment. I
2
EXHIBIT G STP 018292
Case 0:05-cv-01348-JNE-SRN Document 36 Filed 01/16/2007 Page 30 of 46

will research the Open Meeting Act and fo~lardit to you. I admit I have not looked at the Open
Meeting Act for awhile as I have not needed to.
5. By forcing a vacate of the building by revoking the Certificate of Occupancy, we
will now have a vacant building on a corner where there is criminal activity. As you know, there is
nothing that will blight a neighborhood more than a vacant building on a city corner. There will no
longer be "eyes and ears" watching the criminal activity. Since Mr. King was working "hand-inhand"
with the Force Unit, he would be able to put good tenants in the building. Without having
people in the building there will be no additional "eyes and ears" thereby resulting in an increase
of criminal activity on the corner.
Although the neighbors consistently claimed there are still squatters, there is
absolutely no evidence of that. They have already proven not to be credible. Mr. King assures
me that he has not allowed squatters in, has secured the building and is working with the Force
Unit to prevent squatters. I went over to the building to take pictures for the hearing and I could
not get in.
6. I was informed by the legislative hearing officer that I would be informed of her
decision by noon today so we could send you written comments. It is now 1:30PM and I was
never called regarding her decision.
If you have any questions or comments, please do not hesitate to contact me and I hope
the City Council will allow Legal Services to collaborate with the District IV Community Council,
the Force Unit, the Fire Marshall, the caretaker and the neighbors to rectify this situation as it is
not common that we are able to obtain a cooperative caretaker who works for an alleged problem
landlord. I would hate to lose the opportunity to collaborate together on this case as it does
appear that we have got the owner's attention and were making great progress despite the "hide
the ball" tactics that were being played by the inspectors office.
ss
encs
cc Robert King
Debbie Montgomery
Dave Thune
Pat Harris
Jay Benanav
Lee Helgen
Dan Bostrom
EXHIBIT

1:29 PM

unday, January 21, 2007 28 comments links to this post




Forwarded Message:

Subj:Lillenews 7Jan07 AliceKrengel Seniero
Date:1/21/2007 7:46:46 P.M. Central Standard Time
From:Sharon4Anderson
To:sloy@lillienews.com, alicekrengel@yahoo.com, RKuepp5640, bbonner@pioneerpress.com, mreeve@pioneerpress.com
Right-click picture(s) to display picture options


Click here: http://www.angelfire.com/mn3/advocate7/alice2006/WSPwomanguiltytrespas12007.pdf


To whom it may concern:Seth Loy Editor Media et al

by information and belief the article written by you published 7Jan07 must also have the Trusted Professionals, Powers of Attorneys, the Jury who were denied the evidence of just who owns 823 Allen with any all medical records for strict scrunity.

If in fact the Risk Management of the city of west stpaul has the building insured then pursuant to the UCC Damages are due and payable to the owner Alice Krengel

Thank you for your time: However it appears that Kory Land of the www.levander.com law firm ie: Justice Paul Anderson is making false statement not in the record, thereby Fraud upon the Court.

It would do Justice to inquire www.mncourts.gov for the most recent rulings in the Krengel Case.

Where are the Bernsteins and Woodwards of the Nixon Era?

Please visit www.alicekrengel.blogspot.com for

EMINENT DOMAIN: Alice Krengel, 823 Allen, WSP



Alice Krengel - Google Search The undersigneds point of contention pursuant the the Conspiracy Theory, is that Mayor John Zanmiller of West St. Paul, also conflict on the St. Paul Water Board, with 113Dec06tCityCo_6 Billion in Reserves: re: www.sharonanderson.org is using political power for pecuniary gain, exploiting an alleged alcoholic.

The Court should have put Alice in long term treatment, had the POW Powers of Attorneys take care of the realestate , put Alice on Social Security Disability potentially for Bipolar examined by a Trusted Professional.

The Court Orders have No Medical Reports to techinally evict.

Please research the record Based on all Findings of Facts, Conclusions of Law, it appears that Prosecutorial Misconduct has occurred.

LEGAL NOTICE: document's are based on SEC filings, current events, interviews, press releases, and knowledge gained as financial journalists, Private Attorney Generals, Candidates for Public Offices, and may contain errors. Investment decisions should not be based solely on these documents Bio for Sharon Anderson , expressly forbids its writers from having financial interests in securities they recommend to readers, affiliated entities, employees, and agents an initial trade recommendation published on the Internet, after a direct mail publication is sent, before acting on that recommendation. TAKING DL_AOL Journal Candidate profile www.blogitbabe.blogspot.com
Senior QueenCandidate2007 Legal Eagle SharonAnderson 1 Journalism Ethics Blogger: www.judicialdelusions.blogspot.com
1986 Petition Jane Duchene MN Bull SharonScarrellaAndersonUSBriefs - Buzznet Photo Sharing Community Sharon'sFedCases1973to2006_13pdf Anderson + Advocates www.sharonanderson.org www.sharon4anderson.org www.alicekrengel.blogspot.com

Sunday, January 14, 2007

State & Federal Court,Complicity,Costs,Committments

PLEASE TAKE LEGAL NOTICE:
EDemFile76-178US_ScarrellavMidWestFedS&L 23page 5 min download: 30 years NEVER Compensation or quiet titles
Bert McKasy former Commerce Commissioner ,

CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY_ HOMELESS ALICE KRENGEL ET AL

NOTICE OF APPEARANCE ELECTRONICALLY,

MS 611.025Responsibility 42 USC 3631

US CODE: Title 42,TITLE 42—THE PUBLIC HEALTH AND WELFARE

AFFIDAVIT OF SHARON SCARRELLA ANDERSON 15Jan07

Martin Luther King Day who would have been 78 .
From the graves of Alice's Stepdad xxx Krengel, Lawyer for the Burlington RR, Sharons Tenant in Common,decedants Wm.O and Bernice A.Peterson.

Intervenor, private Attorney General,with Humble Plea's to the State of Minnesota All branch's, notice to all Lawyers to hold Government Accountable via www.lawandpolitics.com "Kaplan" Sharon also
victim of corrupt courts, that has led to Death, Disability,for 30 years,
www.sharon4anderson.org
must share Alice's pain,injury, suffering, go public.electronically.

ISSUE'S :PRIVATE PROPERTY TAKEN WITHOUT COMPENSATION


JR&SharonHomeless_17pdfs/files/SharonPeterson


In re: Scarrella for Associate Justice 221sNW2d562 MN Supreme Court No 45250 Aug. 13th 1974, Prennial Candidate for Attorney General, Not a Liar or Lawyer , click on pic to enlarge (33) years later, We the People do not have Fair Elections in the US much less Oversea's the undersigned

has standing: also a Directly injured party in realestate (13) propertys


American Civil Liberties Union : ACLU Seeks Answers and Congressional Oversigh US Supreme Court Ruling Case
Shelly v Kramer RestCovUS(1947)


AMICUS ADVOCATES,FOR ALICE KRENGEL'HOMESTEAD

Anderson + AdvocatesShoeboxBriefs Been there Done that

Published in Good Faith via Blog, by information and belief: Staff Attorney Cynthia Lehr651-297-1025 stated: 3 Judge Panel Toussaint,Schumaker,Dietzen 1:00pm CLOSED TO PUBLIC 16Jan07

STATE OF MINNESOTA -------------- DISTRICT COURT



COUNTY OF DAKOTA ------------- FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT
* * * * * * * * * * * * *
City of West St. Paul, Plaintiff: Court File C8-06-8776 Appellate File A062351
vs Alice Jane Krengel DefendantAliceCourtOrder
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
EMINENT DOMAINE: Alice Krengel, 823 Allen, West St. Paul, MN 55118

Venue: ie:West St. Paul Mayor John Zanmiller, also V Chair of St. Paul Water Board must be added individually, official capacity, severally, State of Minnesota, All Agencies, County of Dakota,
Case LawKrengel Construction cousins of Alice.


John Doe and Mary Roe Ex. www.sharonanderson.org in Alice's Eviction for having a drink in her own Homestead. the undersigned has not read the briefs as of yet, is objecting in good faith on procedures, MS609.43,etc. 8th Amend Cruel and unusual Punishment, Rule 24.04 www.ag.state.mn.us Lori Swanso_17n must come in to defend Constitutionality of Nuisance LawNuisance laws. Bull MN_France Election v Thune91_22
PropertyTaxsPaid1977CourtFilesQuietTitles,EquitySkimming,FraudulentConveyances

I Complaint John T. Finley, Ramsey County Distri

Sharon'sFedCases1973to2006_13pdf

Rule of Law Threats - Unpublished Nonopinions and Inherent Power Sanctions

DahnsLizPendens Nancy Osterman’s story Manoucher Rostamkhani, Relator, vs. City of St. Paul, et al., Respondents. C7-

Federal Fair Housing Laws & Executive Orders - Real Estate Center

Legal Eagle SharonAnderson Sharon4Anderson'sAOLLegal BlogBriefs

Kelo_58pdf Scarrella221NW2d562Justice.jpg (image)

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * WaterEDemA06-1150
SharonScarrellaAnderson AffSerBLOG


Disclaimer : Myers Respondant
Richard A.Myers, et al., Respondents, vs. Hearth Technologies, Inc., f/k/a He
ISSUES

1. Did the trial court abuse its discretion by admitting evidence of the changed instructions?

2. Did the trial court err by denying Hearth's motion for directed verdict against Energy Plus?

3. Did the trial court abuse its discretion by denying Hearth's motion for a new trial on damages or for remittitur?

4. Did the trial court err by awarding preverdict interest on the past general damages award?

ANALYSIS

The decision to grant a new trial lies within the sound discretion of the trial court and will not be disturbed absent a clear abuse of that discretion. Halla Nursery, Inc. v. Baumann-Furrie & Co., 454 N.W.2d 905, 910 (Minn. 1990). We will reverse a jury's verdict only if it is "manifestly and palpably contrary to the evidence viewed as a whole and in the light most favorable to the verdict." Roemer v. Martin, 440 N.W.2d 122, 124 (Minn. 1989) (quotation

v. Hearth Tech C7-00-596,(Schumaker

cited : affiant agree's with the "failure to warn claim" used in the context of 823 Allen Furnace "but for" Amundson 2006 Judicial exploitation of vunerable adult, Appellate Chief Ed Toussaint, Schumaker, knew their coworker was Gay, adopted 4 young boys from Russia, etc. exploited vunerable adult, Disbarment therefore all cases must be revisited:
To quiet Titles, Sanction or criminally prosecute these Judges and lawyers ie: also Metzen, Land MS609.43 MS 340ALiquor To deHumanize Alice when drinking is not a Crime 5th Amend Taking clause
DisciplinaryBradley C. RhodesAitkinCoAttorney,


SHARON SCARRELLA ANDERSON'S
STATE & FEDERAL CASES 1973-2007 OVER 30 Years.
1973 Rev. Sharon Anderson dba Church of Justice Reform
and Rose of Sharon Ministry
Sharon has been denied her property in Aitkin now for 5 years
by prosecutor misconduct Bradley C. Rhodes.Greylord Chicago - Google Search Dakota Co. Sheriff Don Gundmonsun came from Chicago.
Please scrool down further















Name:Sharon Anderson
Office:Minnesota Attorney general
Party:Republican
Incumbent:No
City of residence:St Paul—Aitkin—Nashwauk
Website:http://www.sharonanderson.org/
Title 31 Whistleblower, re: Scarrella for Associate Justice 221NW2d562; 1994 Independent Republican nominee for attorney general; VA widow, political activist; ECF P165913; Pacer sa 1299; www.msnusers.com/AndersonAdvocates web sites educational, real estate entrepreneur; holdings St. Paul, Aitkin, Nashwauk, Gull Lake? Peterson Heritage, Mora, Minn.; Chergosky Heritage Minneapolis.
Endorsements:
Not seeking endorsements.
Essay:
Enforce Art. III Minnesota Constitution separation of powers, MS8.06; advocate high standards, ethics, morality, health care, access, eminent domain compensation. Prosecute violations of case fixing, election fraud, that has repealed the MS2.724. Case A061150. WaterEDemA06-1150. Integrity, public trust, eliminate unpublished opinions, 87 county attorneys, replace 10 district attorneys, enforcement MS8.32-3 Consumers Affairs, parens patriae, jury trials; www.judicialwatch.org; www.sharon4anderson.org; prosecute white collar crime unabated by the monopoly of franchised lawyers ­— judges acting in concert with their franchise.

Gun Lake Association, et al., Relators, vs. County of Aitkin, individually andGeorge Shetka, Respondent, vs. Aitkin County, Minnesota, Appellant. C7-96-2147



Alice's Issue's further the Prosecutorial Misconduct of Kori Land, www.levander.com Justice Paul Anderson's Conflict.



FURTHER AFFIANT SAYETH NOT AT THIS TIME.

Jurisdiction/Authority DahnsLizPendens Indian Medicine Man Native American Healer Eagle Feathers Spirit TravelOlmstead v. US GovLawbreaker

Right to Refuse EntryFAIR HOUSING HOTLINE 2



WE PRAY FOR IMMEDIATE REPO OF 823 ALLEN BY OWNER ALICE KRENGEL OR JUST COMPENSATION THEREOF.



Reserve the right to file a proper electronic brief, altho Alice is not jewish, Reverse Rasicism against a 56 year old causcaisn (sp) must not be tolerated. Amicus Briefs are public.Amicus Briefs Chief Judge Ed Toussaint today is Martin Lurther King Day,
Gentlemen: It is prudent to have tracking/electronic filings of all Courts

First Amendment Library - Case Summary
SharonScarrellaAnderson

Electronic FilingsChairsSen. Metzen Rep Hackbarth Conflict Disclosure Separation
Date:1/14/2007 1:42:43 P.M. Central Standard Time
From:Sharon4Anderson
To:lcc@commissions.leg.state.mn.us
CC:barry.lagrave@house.mn, bbonner@pioneerpress.com, mreeve@pioneerpress.com, curt.brown@startribune.com, pgustafson@startribune.com, mzack@startribune.com, Bill4Dahn, Sharon4Anderson, rbjohnson@yahoo.com, fred.grittner@courts.state.mn.us, askdoj@usdoj.gov, james.lackner@usdoj.gov, rachael.paulose@usdoj.gov, minneapolis@fbi.gov, minneapolis@ic.fbi.gov, edward.toussaint@courts.state.mn.us, gordon.schumaker@courts.state.mn.us, christopher.j.dietzen@courts.state.mn.us, russell.anderson@courts.state.mn.us
Cases specifically the Special Term and SCAP Calendars: closed to public scrunity contrary to Court Fundings, open meeting laws,Anti-Trust laws.

Basically www.mncourts.gov tax supported is updated.

Sen. James Metzen with full disclosure of your Judge Sister-in-law Leslie Metzen , Metzen Realestate Col.
Hi Barry aren't Blogs great please visit

Malpractice by Judge Metzen Separation of Powers


Thanks Sharon http://www.sharonanderson.org/ Writs on Web.

In a message dated 1/12/2007 4:34:08 P.M. Central Standard Time, Barry.LaGrave@house.mn writes:
Minnesota House of Representatives


LEGAL NOTICE: document's are based on SEC filings, current events, interviews, press releases, and knowledge gained as financial journalists, Private Attorney Generals, Candidates for Public Offices, and may contain errors. Investment decisions should not be based solely on these documents Bio for Sharon Anderson , expressly forbids its writers from having financial interests in securities they recommend to readers, affiliated entities, employees, and agents an initial trade recommendation published on the Internet, after a direct mail publication is sent, before acting on that recommendation. TAKING DL_AOL Journal Candidate profile http://www.blogitbabe.blogspot.com/
Senior QueenCandidate2007 Legal Eagle SharonAnderson 1 Journalism Ethics Blogger: www.judicialdelusions.blogspot.com
1986 Petition Jane Duchene MN Bull SharonScarrellaAndersonUSBriefs - Buzznet Photo Sharing Community Sharon'sFedCases1973to2006_13pdf Anderson + Advocates http://www.sharonanderson.org/ http://www.sharon4anderson.org/

Thursday, January 11, 2007

Diva's Bar In Alice homeowner Out

PETITION ELECTRONIC FILINGS
HON. TOUISSANT CHIEF JUDGE

Public Scrunity RICO III mandated for due process, equal treatment.
3 judge panel Tues.16Jan07

Diva's Bar on Rice St. St.Paul, Author of Nuisance Ordinance Andy Dawkins, made a deal to keep Diva's open, Fed. Litigation RICO
while Homeowner Alice is Out on the streets living at Dorothy Day.cousins to Alice.Case LawKrengel Construction

We the People must make the Courts Accountable, please read download the Court Order, signed by Judge Leslie Metzen also Judge on the State Committment Panel,SCAP

UNPUBLISHED OPINIONS USED FOR EVICTION
not applicable to homeowner Alice Krengel 823 Allen
VIA REPEALED NUISANCE LAW IS BIZZARE.
UnpublishedOpinions//judiciary.house.gov/media/334.pdf

1. Forensic Evidence: Court Orders, Re: Alice Krengel
a.AliceCourtOrder
b. Jackl v.Bower668NW2d(MNAp2003)HogFarmsetback reversed and remanded
b (i) Dorthy Jackel, et al., Respondents, vs. Jon W. Brower, Appellant, County of St
c. Ricky Lee Edling, et al., Relators, vs. Isanti County, et al., Respondents. A0 revocation of conditional use permit.

d. Edina Community Lutheran Church, et al., Appellants, vs. State of Minnesota, R published Church Constitutionality Gun Law
e. Jedneak v. Mpls Gen Elec 4 NW2d326 (1942)
PC froze downloading?

THEREFORE AS SHARON HAS STANDING BY HER ECF & PACER ACCTS.

The "Order" dtd. 11-15-06 Metzen, Prosecutor Levander Law Firm Kori Land, smrls defense julia Althoff,

is Vague, Defective, Heinous Abuse of Judicial Authority, triggering Sanctions of Judicial Malpractice, acting in concort with prosecutorial misconduct,

because of the following:Conclusions:
1. Alice has/had no Intent to break any Laws, 2.maintain
the court must be aprised that 823 Allen is across the street
from (2) Bars Martys, Liguor,and Grocery Liquor Store.
" Alice cannot be charged with Nuisance outside of the
Homestead".
3. Constitutionality of Statute mandates Rule 24.04
Attorney General "material substantial"
4. INTENT? 5. MS.617.81 sub.2 is not applicable to
HOMEOWNER.
THEREFORE:
We Pray for the following:

Recuse Metzen: Remand-Restitution to make Alice
WHOLE:

Punatitive, Compensatory, Tort Damages over $2 Million dollars
Intervention of the State and Federal Attorneys
Judges As Criminals? 42 USC 3631


EvChurch v.LA "taking"Amicus BriefsSharon'sFedCases1973to2006_13pdf

Election v Thune91_22
Involuntary Servitude and Peonage

AmicusCuriaejudicialwatch06-2095/06-2140_27
US v. Cruikshank 5th Amend Taking clause
Submitted in Good Faith to force the MN Supreme Court
electronic filings.
/ Vote Sharon Anderson Private Attorney General Advocate 4 YOU
telfx: 651-776-5824 ECF P165913 sa1299
www.sharonanderson.org Senior QueenCandidate2007
www.sharon4anderson.org SharonScarrellaAnderson Election Contests www.judicialdelusions.blogspot.com

Election Law Complaints www.msnusers.com/AndersonAdvocates Sharon4Anderson@aol.com Sharons_LeSeurs: Sharons Strength,Soul,with Sisters LeSeurs
shewolfeagle@aol.com

Wednesday, January 10, 2007

Alice Krengel Denied Due Process Homestead

Subject:http://www.mncourts.gov/documents/Electronic Filings
Date:1/10/2007 2:17:58 P.M. Central Standard Time
From:Sharon4Anderson
TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: 10Jan07
ETHICS IN GOVERNMENT AND SPEEDY TRIAL ACT


42 USC 3631 MS 2.724ChiefJustice
ACCOUNTABILITY OF STATE FUNDS FOR COURT OPERATION UCC

Bob Hanson Minnesota Supreme Court, Rachael Paulose US Justice, Lori Swanson MNAG
et al, MEDIA
Information Technology Division
Director
(651) 297-7636 (phone


AFFIDAVIT OF Quitam WHISTLEBLOWER Candidate for State Attorney General Sharon Anderson brings to the Seats of Government, the wilful neglience of the www.mncourts.gov to implement, expidete electronic filings. in compliance with 2006 Courts Strategic Plan. to benefit the taxpayers,public.


Sharon has standing in good faith, with her ECF and Pacer Acct in sig below

http://www.mncourts.gov/documents/0/Public/Court_Administration/Strategic_Plan_for_Minnesota_Courts.pdf False Claims Act - Taxpayers Against Fraud - QUI TAM - False Claims Act


FOIA REQUEST:
We are tracking the Alice Krengel Matter: apparantly the Staff Attorneys' ie:

EMINENT DOMAIN IN MINNESOTA: Case study Alice Krengel, 823 Allen, WSP Cynthia Lehr
staff attorney, who does answer her tel; 651-297-1025, "but for"

Calendars,Motions,Writs,etc are not published,available to the public contrary to page 8 of
IDLNameFNameMNameSuffixCityState
0129306LEHR CYNTHIA L ST PAUL MN
Mission Statement

IDLNameFNameMNameSuffixCityState
0072345METZEN LESLIE M HASTINGS MN
makes tracking of public dollars "out of thin air"

when we the Public verily believes that Judge Metzen Dr. xxxx Metzen of the UofM Board of Regents and related to Sen Jim Metzen, Metzen Realestate, has exceeded her Authority, in the Krengel Matter, the http://www.lufsky.blogspot.com/ now at St. Peter State Hospital for (7) years.
costing the taxpayers millions of dollars.
THEREFORE THIS SIMPLE QUITAM REQUIST, INVOLVING ANY JUDGE EXCEEDING THEIR AUTHORITY, RENDERING A HOMEOWNER HOMELESS FOR PECUNIARY GAIN OF THE METZEN FAMILY MUST NOT BE TOLERATED.


http://www.mncourts.gov/documents/0/Public/Court_Administration/Strategic_Plan_for_Minnesota_Courts.pdf

Strategic Goal 1: ACCESS TO JUSTICE
Priority 1B: Institute electronic case initiation
ISSUE
Citation processing is among the highest volume, most labor-intensive activities for Minnesota courts. Most information needed to initiate a citation in district court is already entered by law enforcement in their records management systems. Electronic case initiation, or e-filing, is the ability of external parties to file case initiation documents with the court in an electronic format, eliminating the need for manual entry of this information by the courts.
E-filing will allow courts to more quickly process cases, reduce the number of errors in court data, and enhance the productivity of court administration staff resources. The end result of this effort will be more timely access to accurate information by the public and a more efficient court system.
OBJECTIVE
Develop a highly efficient, accurate process for the initiation of criminal and juvenile cases, and pave the way for civil e-filing.
APPROACH
• Develop the capacity for MNCIS to accept criminal and juvenile complaints and citations electronically
• Foster participation in e-filing by prosecutors, law enforcement, and government agencies to realize e-filing’s full potential
• Analyze the costs and benefits of court record imaging


LEGAL NOTICE: document's are based on SEC filings, current events, interviews, press releases, and knowledge gained as financial journalists, Private Attorney Generals, Candidates for Public Offices, and may contain errors. Investment decisions should not be based solely on these documents Bio for Sharon Anderson , expressly forbids its writers from having financial interests in securities they recommend to readers, affiliated entities, employees, and agents an initial trade recommendation published on the Internet, after a direct mail publication is sent, before acting on that recommendation. TAKING DL_AOL Journal Candidate profile http://www.blogitbabe.blogspot.com/
Senior QueenCandidate2007 Legal Eagle SharonAnderson 1 Journalism Ethics Blogger: www.judicialdelusions.blogspot.com
1986 Petition Jane Duchene MN Bull SharonScarrellaAndersonUSBriefs - Buzznet Photo Sharing Community Sharon'sFedCases1973to2006_13pdf Anderson + Advocates http://www.sharonanderson.org/ http://www.sharon4anderson.org/

s/Sharon4Anderson@aol.com telfx:651-776-5835-P165913sa1299: www.judicialdelusions.blogspot.com www.blogitbabe.blogspot.com
Senior QueenCandidate2007
Sharons_LeSeurs: Sharons Strength,Soul,with Sisters LeSeurs

www.msnusers.com/AndersonAdvocates Sharon'sStarProfile www.sharon4anderson.org SharonScarrellaAnderson
Sharons E_ServiceBlog Legal Eagle SharonAnderson Eminent Domain takings

www.sharonanderson.org
Bio for Sharon Anderson Sharon4Anderson's Legal BlogBriefs Vision America: 2006 VOTE SHARON ANDERSON ATTORNEY GENERAL
US v Cruikshank92US542(1875)Decend to Particulars Olmstead v. US GovLawbreaker
OIC SharonScarrellaAndersonUSBriefs - Buzznet Photo Sharing Community
1058SummitSharonLegalDomicile
andersonadvocat - Buzznet Photo Sharing Community
VA Widow's redress US Dist. Court Ann Montgomery when JR was at Brainard for 1 andersonadvocat - Buzznet Photo Sharing Community Salute The Troops& Cpl. James R. Anderson USMC:11028855 USCAVC Docket 03-0639 Sharon L. Anderson
Bull : Events WHISTLEBLOWER TITLE 31 BILLDAHN V.JESSIEVENTURA - Buzznet Photo Sharing Commun















AngelsAndersonAdvocates

AngelsAndersonAdvocates

Common Law